

But while the “joint” part of JADC2 is important, each service faces different command-and-control challenges, he said. Doug Small, the commander of Naval Information Warfare Systems Command and the program manager for Project Overmatch.

Once operational, Project Overmatch will ultimately flow into a “joint command structure,” said Rear Adm.
#Carrier battle group software#
“What Project Overmatch is designed to do is” use software to translate “automatically between different communication systems,” he said. Like the other services, the Navy has a variety of communication systems that are not necessarily interoperable, “and you have to create gateways that connect them together, or you’ve got to put multiple radios on everything in the force to be able to allow them to communicate,” Clark said in an interview. The aim of Project Overmatch is to “create a more interoperable force, allowing more pieces of the Navy - more ships, more aircraft, more unmanned systems later on - to be able to connect with one another and talk to one another, using the Navy’s wildly diverse collection of communication systems,” said Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at Hudson Institute. The Army has held annual Project Convergence experiments and Air Force leadership has openly discussed its plans for the Advanced Battle Management System, but the Navy has remained tight-lipped about Project Overmatch, the service’s component of the JADC2 initiative to connect sensors to shooters across all warfighting domains. NATIONAL HARBOR, Maryland - The Navy has revealed little about its contribution to the Defense Department’s joint all-domain command and control initiative but has started experimenting with systems that will bring the concept to life at sea, service leaders say.

Part 6 of 7-part special report on the Defense Department’s joint all-domain command and control, or JADC2, concept.
